2014-08-01 14:24 GMT+02:00 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected]>: > The scenario is that you want to notify the user about the process going > away and give him one last chance. IIRC he can prevent the loop from > exiting by creating new handles in this event. But all that is beyond > the point. Bottom line is: not all applications are like yours, other > people have different needs, and there is no One True Design To Rule > Them All (TM).
Sure. I just say that any design in which the loop is exited without releasing its resources (handles and so on) is a Bad Design (TM). -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
