Clear. Thanks. 2014-08-07 17:36 GMT+02:00 Fedor Indutny <[email protected]>: > The advantage is speed, if the kernel buffer is empty - it'll be just copied > without costly invocation of the syscall. > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, write() allows passing more than a single buffer. Which is the >> advantage, in terms of performance, over calling N times to write()? >> >> NOTE: When I say "write()" I want to say "first try try_write() and >> fallback to write() if it fails". >> >> Thanks a lot. >> >> -- >> Iñaki Baz Castillo >> <[email protected]> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "libuv" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "libuv" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- Iñaki Baz Castillo <[email protected]> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
