Well, I see same code in 0.10.32 so somebody could have problem with
copy/paste.
I have 0.10 in production so move to 1.x will not be easy.
Is the latest 0.10.32 stable enough to use in production?
Thanks.
On Friday, January 23, 2015 at 2:07:10 PM UTC-8, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 01/23/2015 10:33 PM, rusname wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am using libuv-0.10.27
> >
>
> Wow, that's ancient! :-)
>
> > test/echo-server.c
> >
> > static void after_write(uv_write_t* req, int status) {
> > write_req_t* wr;
> > uv_err_t err;
> >
> > /* Free the read/write buffer and the request */
> > wr = (write_req_t*) req;
> > free(wr->buf.base);
> > free(wr);
> >
> > if (status == 0)
> > return;
> >
> > err = uv_last_error(loop);
> > fprintf(stderr, "uv_write error: %s\n", uv_strerror(err));
> >
> > if (err.code == UV_ECANCELED)
> > return;
> >
> > ASSERT(err.code == UV_EPIPE);
> > uv_close((uv_handle_t*)req->handle, on_close);
> > }
> >
> > Should not we take handle ptr before free(wr) ?
> >
>
> Yes, indeed. That has been fixed somewhere along the way. I suggest you
> upgrade to the latest and greatest, for reduced bugs and increased
> awesomeness.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> bettercallsaghul.com
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"libuv" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
