Thanks, Ben. Let me try to explore uv_idle_t handler. As always, appreciate your response which opens up new exciting area.
On Monday, 2 March 2015 17:17:15 UTC+5:30, Ben Noordhuis wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Devchandra Meetei <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > That's right. I am with you. I never said that are asynchronous. > > Just curious what will be the best way to dealt in such scenario to make > it > > asynchronous. > > May be this is not related to libuv also. But wanted to get some expert > > advice on such scenario. > > Please forgive me for asking non libuv related questions on libuv list. > > Sorry, I missed your reply. If you want to break up an operation into > asynchronous pieces, you can use an uv_idle_t. > > The 'idle' in uv_idle_t is a bit of a misnomer: the callback fires > repeatedly as long as it's active, not just when the event loop is > idle. We copied the name from libev but we didn't end up implementing > the libev semantics. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
