> What are the use-cases for a libuv repo though? How many people are going to actually have use for that?
Basically everybody who develops applications that dynamically link to libuv (e.g. by using some of the bindings listed on https://github.com/libuv/libuv/wiki/Projects-that-use-libuv). Getting a recent 1.0 release of libuv on Debian/Ubuntu means building from source as there's no package available (the distro repos ship 0.10). Having an official libuv repo that I can add for getting the latest libuv releases would be highly appreciated. -- Alex Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015 15:07:05 UTC+2 schrieb Saúl Ibarra Corretgé: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Rod Vagg" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > Date: Apr 8, 2015 12:43 > Subject: Re: [libuv] Debian packages for libuv > To: "Saúl Ibarra Corretgé" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > Cc: <[email protected] <javascript:>> > > > Possible, probably wouldn't be hard to add it to what we already do. We're > currently having to restructure the way we manage our Node deb and rpm > repos since we've added a bunch of complexity with Node 0.12 and io.js but > this means adding on some additional people to be involved in maintaining > them. > > What are the use-cases for a libuv repo though? How many people are going > to actually have use for that? > > > > ``` > > *Rod Vagg* > NodeSource > @rvagg > > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> On 04/08/2015 12:18 PM, Alexander Köplinger wrote: >> > Hi! >> > >> > I'm interested in Debian packages of libuv releases. Saghul told me last >> > night on IRC that there are no current plans for making those and I >> > should ask on the mailing list for some comments :) >> > >> > My primary interest is in having easy access to the latest libuv >> > releases so I can use it in applications/libraries that build on top of >> it. >> > >> >> Not sure if Rodd is on this list so I CC'd him. Rodd (or anybody else >> really), would NodeSource be willing/able to host these packages, >> assuming someone provided the debian packaging boilerplate/template? >> >> We could go with v1.x only, since it's a lot easier to package, due to >> the use of autoconf. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> -- >> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé >> bettercallsaghul.com >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
