Submitted here:
https://github.com/libuv/libuv/issues/1078
Thanks for help!
On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 4:08:29 PM UTC+3, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2016 02:01 PM, Elad Nachmias wrote:
> > 1. Regarding `uv_poll_t` handle, what would happen in the following
> > sequence:
> > (a) I started polling on a fd of a tcp socket.
> > (b) The socket become readable.
> > (c) The handle's callback is called (it does not read, and the socket is
> > still readable).
> > The callback stop & start the poll handle, and then return.
> > void poll_cb(handle, ...) { uv_poll_stop(handle);
> > uv_poll_start(handle); }
> > Will the callback be called over-and-over again?
> >
>
> Yes.
>
> > 2. Another sequence:
> > (a) I started polling on a fd of a tcp socket.
> > (b) The socket become readable.
> > (c) The handle's callback is called. the callback reads some of the
> > available data but not all of it.
> > Will the callback be called again? (because the socket is actually still
> > readable)
>
> Yes.
>
> > If not, stoping&starting the handle can make it call the callback again?
> > Is it the right practice to do so in that case?
> >
> > If the behaviour is well defined (and not implementation dependent), I
> > think the official documentation should elaborate on the subject.
> >
>
> Can you file an issue please?
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> bettercallsaghul.com
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"libuv" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
