Hi! On 12/16/2016 08:57 AM, Vincent de RIBOU wrote: > Hi all, > > I noticed that many ways are possible to build platform dependent items. > For example, native windows uses Python tool, when MinGW uses custom > makefile and finaly autotools for posix platforms. > > Since I am developping components on many platform types, I think it > will be very interesting to have only one build system, whatever it > could be. >
Why is that? You can just choose the right one for your usecase. Or even others! There are some CMake files around maintained by third parties, pick your poison :-) > What's your opinion? > Do you thnk it is possible? > Not really. On Windows and Unix one can use GYP, but not for MinGW. On Unix one can use autotools, which is the most common approach. Last, the MinGW makefile is gone from the master branch, since MinGW users can use autoconf. > How to validate all configs, complete LibUV solution or subcomponent > are included at the same time in all build systems? > I don't understand what you ask here. Can you rephrase? If you worry something won't work, we hace a pretty extensive CI which tests with both build systems. Cheers, -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé bettercallsaghul.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to libuv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to libuv@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
