Ben Noordhuis於 2017年4月25日星期二 UTC+8上午5時23分05秒寫道： > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:54 PM, Narsilx Liao <[email protected] > <javascript:>> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm new to libuv and I know that is not thread-safe except > > uv_async_send(). > > > > I'm writing a program(with linux c) that will create a thread(the loop > > thread) for uv_run(), which receives commands from a socket fd for > creating > > or removing timers from the same loop.The Main thread will send commands > > through another socket fd to control timers creating/removing on the > loop. > > > > I wonder that is it safe to add a new timer to a loop in a uv_poll_t > > callback which also on the same loop? > > Yes, that is safe. > > > in the callback should I call uv_stop() the loop first , add a new timer > to > > loop and uv_run() the loop again?or It is safe to add a timer directly > > without uv_stop() and uv_run() the loop? > > I assume uv_stop() means uv_poll_stop()? Not necessary, you can > create the timer handle immediately. > Oh, I mean, should I stop the current loop with uv_stop(uv_loop_t <http://docs.libuv.org/en/v1.x/loop.html#c.uv_loop_t>** loop*) first, and create timers with the loop, then uv_run() the loop again?or just init and start timers without uv_stop(loop) and uv_start(loop, mode)?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/libuv. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
