On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:08 PM Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 12:05, Ben Noordhuis <i...@bnoordhuis.nl> wrote: > > -1 corresponds to UV_EPERM on most platforms. > > > > If your assumption is that because the type is ssize_t it can only be > > >= -1, that's mistaken. Hope that helps! > > What is mistaken? All references I read about ssize_t say that it's > supposed to be >= -1: > > For instance, > https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_types.h.html: > > > The type ssize_t shall be capable of storing values at least in the range > > [-1, {SSIZE_MAX}].
Note the "at least." :-) In practice it's a signed type that's capable of representing at least -INT_MAX-1 to INT_MAX. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "libuv" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to libuv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/libuv/CAHQurc-GX7RCbobQTTnUidYQ9SyZPwda9WbZ_mZGccoQqsYkdA%40mail.gmail.com.
