Hi, 2012/10/19 ykzhao <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 07:19 -0600, Zhao, Yakui wrote: >> From: Zhao Yakui <[email protected]> >> >> It uses the variable of locked_image_id to check whether one surface is >> locked >> or not. But as the locked_image_id is not assigned correctly, it causes that >> it can't lock one surface next time although it calls the vaUnlockSurfaces. > > Any comment about this patch?
I think you should move the assignment down after the "error:" clause and s/error/end/ because otherwise, you wouldn't be able to lock a surface again if an error occurred. Then, it should be fine. Regards, Gwenole. _______________________________________________ Libva mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libva
