On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 23:28 -0700, Vadim Zaliva wrote: > I have a dumb question about new error handling. What is the rationale > for using > 'libvirt_message' instead of 'message' in new Libvirt Ruby error > classes?
The 'message' in the exception is set, too, usually to the name of the libvirt function that returned the error. libvirt_message stores additional error details from virError, which is not always available. That's how it works at the moment, but I am open to suggestions to change that. David -- Libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
