On 2014/8/28 5:20, Maxime Leroy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Wang Rui <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 2014/8/22 18:47, Maxime Leroy wrote:
>>
>>> +# util/virivshmemserver.h
>>> +virStartIvshmemServer;
>>> +virStopIvshmemServer;
>>
>> I think function name virIvshmemStartServer is better.
>> So is the stop function.
>>
>
> What about virIvshmemServerStart ?
It looks fine.
>>> @@ -5120,6 +5121,12 @@ qemuBuildIvshmemCommandLine(virCommandPtr cmd,
>>> return -1;
>>> virCommandAddArg(cmd, devstr);
>>> VIR_FREE(devstr);
>>> +
>>> + if (ivshmem->server.start == VIR_TRISTATE_BOOL_YES) {
>>> + if (virStartIvshmemServer(dev->name, ivshmem->server.path,
>>> + ivshmem->size,
>>> ivshmem->msi.vectors))
>>> + return -1;
>>> + }
>>> }
>>
>> I'm not sure that calling virStartIvshmemServer in
>> qemuBuildIvshmemCommandLine
>> is the best way. Maybe qemuBuild*CommandLine() usually only build
>> commandline.
>>
>
> Calling virStartIvshmemServer in qemuProcessStart should be better ?
Looks better, too. But we'd better to wait for other opinions.
> Maxime
>
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
