On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, James Morris wrote: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > > * a virNodeInfo is a structure filled by virNodeGetInfo() and providing > > > @@ -504,6 +567,10 @@ int virDomainSetMaxMemory > > > (virDomainPtr domain, > > > int virDomainSetMemory (virDomainPtr domain, > > > unsigned long memory); > > > int virDomainGetMaxVcpus (virDomainPtr domain); > > > +int virDomainGetSecLabel (virDomainPtr domain, > > > + virDomainSecLabelPtr > > > seclabel); > > > +int virDomainGetSecModel (virDomainPtr domain, > > > + virDomainSecModelPtr > > > secmodel); > > > > I'm leaning two ways on this. On the one hand I could see the > > virDomainGetSecModel being done against the node to match the > > fact that we record it in the node capabilities XML, so perhaps > > virNodeGetSecurityModel(virConnectPtr). > > Actually, this is a call to get the node information, so I think the name > should be changed.
Btw, is 'Node' the correct placement for this information? IIUC, a node is the physical system, whereas, the security model is a property of the hypervisor, and there can be multiple hypervisors running on a node. -- James Morris <[email protected]> -- Libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
