On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Christophe Fergeau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 01:19:31AM +0000, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote: >> Add binding for virDomainOpenGraphicsFD. >> --- >> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c | 36 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.h | 4 ++++ >> libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject.sym | 5 +++++ >> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c >> b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c >> index 8df30d7..9c1aa6e 100644 >> --- a/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c >> +++ b/libvirt-gobject/libvirt-gobject-domain.c >> @@ -1222,6 +1222,42 @@ cleanup: >> } >> >> /** >> + * gvir_domain_open_graphics_fd: >> + * @dom: the domain >> + * @idx: the graphics index >> + * @flags: extra flags, currently unused >> + * >> + * This will create a socket pair connected to the graphics backend of >> @dom. One >> + * end of the socket will be returned on success, and the other end is >> handed to >> + * the hypervisor. If @dom has multiple graphics backends configured, then >> @idx >> + * will determine which one is opened, starting from @idx 0. >> + * >> + * Returns: An fd on success, -1 on failure. >> + */ >> +int gvir_domain_open_graphics_fd(GVirDomain *dom, >> + guint idx, > > Could/should this take a GVirConfigDomainGraphics * instead and infer > the index from it? > I know gvir_domain-open_graphics() uses 'idx', but maybe we should offer > the 2 variants?
Doesn't sound very convenient and also I don't think the API guarantees the order of devices returned from gvir_config_domain_get_devices. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ________________________________________ Befriend GNOME: http://www.gnome.org/friends/ -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
