Hi Michal,

How can we move this along as a patch to libvirt?  Can we submit a patch
ourselves?

--
Noel


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Noel Burton-Krahn <[email protected]>
wrote:

> In our case the network disk is available on the dest before we call
> migration.  It's an openstack volume mounted via ceph.  If we disable the
> copy-check in qemu_migration.c the migration works fine.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:17 AM, Michal Privoznik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 20.03.2015 20:23, Noel Burton-Krahn wrote:
>> > Hi Michal,
>> >
>> > I think issuing a libvirt migrate to a host where the network disks
>> > don't already exist would be a prequisite failure.  Libvirt can never
>> > copy a network disk, but it shouldn't fail trying to migrate an existing
>> > domain that contains a network disk.  If a libvirt user wishes to
>> > migrate a domain that contains a network disk, it's their responsibility
>> > to ensure the disk exists before calling migrate.
>>
>> That's how it was back in the old days. Then libvirt introduced storage
>> migration, but requiring users to pre-create storage on destination
>> themselves. And just recently I taught libvirt to automatically
>> pre-create the storage. However, not for all disk types.
>>
>> If a disk on destination is missing, it's likely broken guest ABI
>> libvirt should have not allowed migration in the first place. How come
>> the migration was allowed?
>>
>> Michal
>>
>
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to