On 09/24/2015 03:45 AM, Ján Tomko wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:18:33PM -0400, John Ferlan wrote: >> This seemed to be more of a false positive as for some reason Coverity >> was missing the "ret < 0" goto error condition and somehow believing that >> event could be overwritten. At first I thought it was just the ret != 0 >> condition difference, but it wasn't. >> > > Then those changes are cosmetic and don't need to be in a commit fixing > the RESOURCE_LEAK. >
OK - I've split this patch in two - cosmetic and resource_leak and pushed the patches that have been ACK'd... I'll continue to plug through issues noted from patch 1 along with the ones referenced in my cover letter. Tks - John -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
