On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 01:22:22 +0000, Ren, Qiaowei wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jiri Denemark [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 5:43 PM > > To: Ren, Qiaowei > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [libvirt] [PATCH 4/8] perf: implement the remote protocol for > > perf > > event > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 16:00:44 +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote: > > > Add remote support for perf event. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <[email protected]> > > > --- > > > daemon/remote.c | 60 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > src/remote/remote_driver.c | 49 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > src/remote/remote_protocol.x | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > src/remote_protocol-structs | 20 +++++++++++++++ > > > 4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > This will need to be changed to match the new style of the API. But, since > > you > > are adding a new API, would you mind creating a patch for libvirt-python to > > add > > this new API to python bindings? > > > > Sure. The patch for libvirt-python should be also sent this maillist with > this series, right?
Well, it's a different repository so sending it in the same series might be a bit tricky. So it's up to you if you send it in one series or send it as a separate patch. And yes, they should all be sent to this mailing list. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
