On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:33:21PM +0100, Pritesh Kothari wrote: > > I guess Dan did a more complete review of the code than mine. One of the > > issues I had was many pieces of code licenced under the MIT Licence, > > which is compatible with the LGPL, but I must admit that if you are the > > authors of that code I would prefer just LGPL. I also saw parts which > > were MIT but allowed to relicence under LGPL, for the sake of uniformity > > I would prefer all files provided under LGPLv2 like the other parts of > > libvirt code. In a sense it's equivalent for you, but for people doing > > the legal review when trying to embbed libvirt this makes things more > > complicated. Any chance you could fix all those headers ? > > I have fixed all headers to be LGPLv2.1 :)
Ah, that's good news :-) Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ [email protected] | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
