On 06/01/2016 07:23 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Cpu mode 'host-model' is not convinient for migration in current form. > Consider migration from less capable host to more capable one - it is > possible. > But then migration backwards is impossible despite the fact that qemu process > on destination is running with the same model and features as on source > because > migration does not update 'host-model' cpu upon migration on destination. The > problem is that on migrating back instead of taking current cpu config > 'host-model' is expanded again and gain extra features of destination and > migration failed by source (new destination) side. > > What if we change cpu for active config from 'host-model' into 'custom' in > the starting process? Then this issue will be fixed. It is quite reasonable > from my POV - 'host-model' is effectively about taking active domain cpu from > host on > start, after that active domain cpu is on its own. Persistent config stays > 'host-model' so migrating of active domain and restarting it gains extra > features of new host as before. >
FWIW I filed a similar bug about this a while back: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054935 - Cole -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
