On 10/24/2016 11:24 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 24.10.2016 16:29, John Ferlan wrote: > [...] >> >> The series looks good to me - do you think it's worthwhile to mention >> anywhere in virsh.pod that the "halted" could mean "really halted" or >> "not scheduled" or "not actively processing" depending on architecture? >> (and how best to say it). > As the other values' documentation is quite terse, I was tempted to stay > in style by being brief as well. Maybe something along the lines of: > ... halted: yes or no (may indicate the processor is idle or even > disabled, depending on the architecture).
Perfect - I went with that. >> >> I can tweak virsh.pod before pushing based on your or others >> feedback/thoughts. >> > Surely no objections from my side. > [...] > > Now pushed John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
