At 2016-11-24 01:29:45, "John Ferlan" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>On 11/12/2016 04:22 AM, Chen Hanxiao wrote:
>> From: Chen Hanxiao <[email protected]>
>>
>> We forget to check the return value of some rados_conf_set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> v2: add another missing return value check
>> v3: fix a copy-paste error
>>
>> src/storage/storage_backend_rbd.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
>Take one more step... Rather than replicating the same message in so
>many different places, why not create a helper
>
>static int
>virStorageBackendRBDRADOSConfSet(rados_t cluster,
> const char *option,
> const char *value)
>{
> VIR_DEBUG("Setting RADOS option '%s' to '%s'",
> option, value);
> if (rados_conf_set(cluster, option, value) < 0) {
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
> _("failed to set RADOS option: %s"),
> option);
> return -1;
> }
> return 0;
>}
>
>
>And all those other places just have:
>
> if (virStorageBackendRBDRADOSConfSet(ptr->cluster, arg2, arg3) < 0)
> goto cleanup;
>
>And be sure also remove the VIR_DEBUG("Found cephx key: %s", rados_key);
>
>Also, try to not have lines longer than 80 cols... makes it tough to
>read the code.
>
Thanks for the review.
I'll send a new patch soon.
Regards,
- Chen
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
