Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:03:21PM +0530, Nitesh Konkar wrote: > > > @@ -9570,16 +9570,17 @@ qemuDomainSetPerfEvents(virDomainPtr dom, > > if (def) { > > for (i = 0; i < nparams; i++) { > > virTypedParameterPtr param = ¶ms[i]; > > - enabled = param->value.b; > > + state = param->value.i; > > NACK, this semantic change is not backwards compatible - this will break > all applications & language bindings currently using libvirt perf events. > > Oh I see . I didn't realize that. Any other API/place you suggest, through which we can get this functionality in? > In addition "reset" is not really a state - "enabled" / "disabled" are > stats - 'reset' is an action that is applied to an existing state. So > modelling 'reset' as a state is wrong too IMHO. > > Regards, > Daniel > Thanks, Nitesh. > -- > |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ > :| > |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org > :| > |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ > :| >
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list