Hi Daniel,

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 04:03:21PM +0530, Nitesh Konkar wrote:
>
> > @@ -9570,16 +9570,17 @@ qemuDomainSetPerfEvents(virDomainPtr dom,
> >      if (def) {
> >          for (i = 0; i < nparams; i++) {
> >              virTypedParameterPtr param = &params[i];
> > -            enabled = param->value.b;
> > +            state = param->value.i;
>
> NACK, this semantic change is not backwards compatible - this will break
> all applications & language bindings currently using libvirt perf events.
>
> Oh I see . I didn't realize that. Any other API/place you suggest, through
which
we can get this functionality in?

> In addition "reset" is not really a state - "enabled" / "disabled" are
> stats - 'reset' is an action that is applied to an existing state. So
> modelling 'reset' as a state is wrong too IMHO.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
Thanks,
Nitesh.

> --
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/
> :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org
> :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-    http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/
> :|
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to