> > > Is there anyone tackling this problem now?( or going to? ) > > Otherwise, any hint would help me. > > I don't think anybody has tried to handle this. The problem I think > is that the mapping would have to be stored and if the hypervisor > doesn't support this maintaining this data in a coherent fashion > will be non-trivial. In any case the design for such a patch should > be discussed here first and with the openvz maintainers to make sure > the effort isn't wasted. >
Openvz supports setting names for containers, see description on --name parameter in vzctl(8). But you (or libvirt) actually need to specify an unique container id anyway.
-- Libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
