[...] > > Even though I came with another proposal, I personally still like the > > previous > > version with one-by-one event version, since despite (perhaps) being a bit > > slower, it's a more transparent and consistent (minus the event counter) > > solution than the one I proposed the last time. > > > > Erik > > > > I don't have that version paged into short term memory ;-)... If you > have a thread that processes events until udev_monitor_receive_device > returns NULL, then does that do the trick? Regardless of event counting?
Well, so far it's just an idea, I haven't tried it yet, it's just it appeared to me like it could. I'll try and get back with results. Erik -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
