On 11/06/2017 08:26 AM, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> The architecture itself is called ppc64, and it can run both in big
> endian and little endian mode - the latter is known as ppc64le.
>
>>From the (virtual) hardware point of view, ppc64 is a more accurate
> name so it should be used here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../{qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml => qemu_2.6.0.ppc64.xml} | 2 +-
> tests/domaincapstest.c | 2 +-
> .../{caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.replies => caps_2.6.0.ppc64.replies} | 0
> .../{caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml => caps_2.6.0.ppc64.xml} | 0
> .../{caps_2.9.0.ppc64le.replies => caps_2.9.0.ppc64.replies} | 0
> .../{caps_2.9.0.ppc64le.xml => caps_2.9.0.ppc64.xml} | 0
> tests/qemucapabilitiestest.c | 4
> ++--
> 7 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> rename tests/domaincapsschemadata/{qemu_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml =>
> qemu_2.6.0.ppc64.xml} (98%)
> rename tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/{caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.replies =>
> caps_2.6.0.ppc64.replies} (100%)
> rename tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/{caps_2.6.0.ppc64le.xml =>
> caps_2.6.0.ppc64.xml} (100%)
> rename tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/{caps_2.9.0.ppc64le.replies =>
> caps_2.9.0.ppc64.replies} (100%)
> rename tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/{caps_2.9.0.ppc64le.xml =>
> caps_2.9.0.ppc64.xml} (100%)
>
So this is just for our tests right? I guess I see a name change like
this and I think - is there some sort of migrate or save/restore issue
we could have by changing the "name"...
Anyway - I see the the "ppc64" matches the JSON return:
{
"return": {
"arch": "ppc64"
},
"id": "libvirt-3"
}
So, close my eyes and hope it all works ;-)
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <[email protected]>
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
