Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 06:46:00PM +0400, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote:
> > Completion in virsh is enabled when readline is available. In order to
> > fix build when it's not available, do the following:
> >
> > * Unconditionally add virsh-completer.[ch] and
> > virt-admin-completer.[ch] to the build, and provide stub functions
> > for when readline is not available. This way virsh builds without
> > complaining about missing symbols used for 'completer' in
> > vshCmdOptDef;
> > * In cmdComplete(), mark unused arguments when there's no readline
> > with ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED.
> > ---
>
> ...
>
> >
> >
> > +#ifdef WITH_READLINE
> > char **
> > virshDomainNameCompleter(vshControl *ctl,
> > const vshCmd *cmd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > @@ -147,3 +148,25 @@ virshDomainInterfaceCompleter(vshControl *ctl,
> > virStringListFree(ret);
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > +#else
> > +char **
> > +virshDomainNameCompleter(vshControl *ctl ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > + const vshCmd *cmd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
> > + unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > + virCheckFlags(-1, NULL);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
>
> Do you actually need to define these "no readline" function versions? I'm
> asking because the completer callbacks are transitively invoked from
> vshReadlineCompletion (and friends) which is only called from the cmdComplete
> which both your and Michal's patch handles. So, are you experiencing any
> problems on any platforms without these hunks? (I compiles fine with just the
> first and last hunk applied, obviously no readline support)
>
> Anyhow, I went ahead and reviewed Michal's patches, so unless you really need
> the hunks I mentioned in the previous paragraph, let's go with Michal's
> instead.
>
> ErikThese stub versions are not needed indeed, let's go with Michal's patches. Roman Bogorodskiy
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
