On 02/06/2018 03:54 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Jamie Strandboge <ja...@canonical.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 10:41 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> Guido Günther:
>>>> --- a/examples/apparmor/usr.sbin.libvirtd
>>>> +++ b/examples/apparmor/usr.sbin.libvirtd
>>>> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
>>>> signal (send) peer=/usr/sbin/dnsmasq,
>>>> signal (read, send) peer=libvirt-*,
>>>> - signal (send) set=("kill") peer=unconfined,
>>>> + signal (send) set=("kill", "term") peer=unconfined,
>>>
>> LGTM too. +1 to apply.
>
> 2 x +1
> 1x resolved Discussion
>
> IMHO nothing should block this from being committed - so ping?
>
> +1 from me as well btw
>
I've just pushed this. BTW: haven't DV granted commit access to somebody
just recently so that they can push these apparmor patches?
Michal
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
