2009/9/7 Mark McLoughlin <mar...@redhat.com> > On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 14:40 +0400, Anton Protopopov wrote: > > > Also, what is the output of 'virsh capabilities' ? > > <guest> > > <os_type>hvm</os_type> > > <arch name='x86_64'> > > <wordsize>64</wordsize> > > <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64</emulator> > > <machine>pc-0.11</machine> > > <machine canonical='pc-0.11'>pc</machine> > > <machine>pc-0.10</machine> > > <machine>isapc</machine> > > <domain type='qemu'> > > </domain> > > <domain type='kvm'> > > <emulator>/usr/bin/kvm</emulator> > > </domain> > ... > > What does 'qemu -M ?' and 'kvm -M ?' give? > > # qemu -M ? > > Supported machines are: > > pc Standard PC (alias of pc-0.11) > > pc-0.11 Standard PC (default) > > pc-0.10 Standard PC, qemu 0.10 > > isapc ISA-only PC > > # kvm -M ? > > Supported machines are: > > pc Standard PC (default) > > isapc ISA-only PC > > Thanks, that shows the problem clearly. We need to probe the kvm binary > for the machine types it supports and include it in its domain info. > > Please try out the four patches following >
Thanks, I will try them tomorrow. > > Cheers, > Mark. > >
-- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
