On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 02:32:11PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote:I found the reverse order, i.e. 'rust PATCH' to be both nicer and more useful. (not to mention more common)For example, in some downstream lists I use a simple text match against 'libvirt PATCH', which also catches any subsequent versionI'm not really seeing why it would make any functional difference to ability to match subjects.
I assume in v2 it would become 'PATCHv2 libvirt', which does not contain the 'PATCH libvirt' string, unlike 'libvirt PATCHv2' and 'libvirt PATCH' Jano
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
