>>> + if (ret == VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR) >>> + goto error; >> >> Admittedly I did not look too closely, but will the compareHypervisorCPU >> functions actually >> return "VIR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR" on error? If so, wouldn't it be more sensible >> to return a >> "VIR_HYPERVISOR_CPU_COMPARE_ERROR" instead? > > The function returns a value from enum virCPUCompareResult just like the > original connectCompareCPU API. I don't see a reason for introducing a > new set of return values for the new connectCompareHypervisorCPU. >
Yeah, that makes sense. Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <[email protected]> -- Respectfully, - Collin Walling -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
