On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 11:31:36AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 07/03/2018 04:20 AM, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> > This macro avoids code duplication when checking for arrays of objects.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > src/esx/esx_vi.c | 189 ++++++++++++-----------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 143 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/esx/esx_vi.c b/src/esx/esx_vi.c
> > index 25fbdc7e44..212300dbff 100644
> > --- a/src/esx/esx_vi.c
> > +++ b/src/esx/esx_vi.c
> > @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@
> >
> > VIR_LOG_INIT("esx.esx_vi");
> >
> > +#define esxVI_checkArgList(val) \
> > + do { \
> > + if (!val || *val) { \
> > + virReportError(VIR_ERR_INVALID_ARG, "%s", _("Invalid
> > argument")); \
>
> Actually, this is one of the few places where VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR is
> not misused and makes sense. The only way how this error can be reported
> is if there's a bug in our code, not because of some input user made.
>
> There are also other occurrences of this pattern. coccinelle helped to
> find other. I used the following spatch:
>
> @@
> identifier ptr;
> @@
>
> - (!ptr || *ptr)
> + (esxVI_checkArgList(ptr))
>
>
> Mind putting them here too? Otherwise the patch looks good.
No problem. I will take a look into coccinele and resend the patch once all
other places are covered. Thanks for pushing the other patches and fixing the
code style.
>
> Michal
--
Thanks,
Marcos
--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
