On 12.07.2018 08:32, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
>> For libvirt, I think whenever something is proposed for deprecation
>> we could just CC libvir-list, or ask one of the libvirt people to
>> confirm its not being used. If it is, then we should file BZ against
>> libvirt.
> Makes sense, but relying on developers getting their cc: right every
> time is a setting us up for failure.
> Our tool to help with getting cc: wrong less often is the MAINTAINERS
> file.  Could one of the libvirt developers watch changes to qemu-doc
> appendix "Deprecated features"?  Would putting the appendix in its own
> .texi help with that?

Sound like a good idea to put the appendix in its own texi file. Then
add an "R: libvir-list" entry for that file to MAINTAINERS and we should
be fine (at least for the people who use the get_maintainers.pl script).


libvir-list mailing list

Reply via email to