On 07/03/2018 07:37 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> ...since maxWorkers=0 is only intended for virtlockd or virlogd which
> must not be multithreaded.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <[email protected]>
> ---
>  src/util/virthreadpool.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 

I think this is separable - this could be pushed regardless of the
outcome of patch2, right? Let me know - I can reduce the load the next
update based on patch2 comments.

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <[email protected]>

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to