On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 13:16 +0200, Erik Skultety wrote: > To be honest, I kinda was counting on you sending a follow-up regardless of > my comment, because as you said, it's always better to document this properly > in relevant files :). At the same time though, I needed to experience e.g. the > failure with missing xz-static on CentOS 7 myself to actually figure out, what > it is that makes the build fail. So, even though I'm not insisting on you > changing the commit messages, I think that dropping a note about specific > missing requirements for a successful build as a justification for those 2 > patches in play won't add much work. Anyhow, my RB still stands.
Note that the ultimate source of truth for which projects can be successfully built on which platform is the Jenkins configuration, not the guest configuration, and I'm not touching the former at all because we were (correctly) already excluding platforms where we knew the build would fail; this commit and the following one merely clean up an oversight which caused a few unnecessary packages to be installed in guests. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list