Maybe a few words here about the option being used to hold a persistent
config that could be different than the snapshot's running domain def.

On 12/13/18 3:03 AM, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Shirokovskiy <[email protected]>
> ---
>  docs/schemas/domainsnapshot.rng | 10 ++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 

Seems reasonable - although I wonder if this should be combined with the
next two patches as well... That's not a big deal though...

I actually prefer "persistent" over "newDef" or a/k/a "nextPersistentDef".

Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <[email protected]>

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to