On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 4:03 PM Eric Blake <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/11/19 6:04 AM, Ilias Stamatis wrote: > > Update the current or max memory, on the persistent or live definition > > depending on the flags which are currently ignored. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ilias Stamatis <[email protected]> > > --- > > src/test/test_driver.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Incomplete. You also need to fix what I missed in commit 667ac11e, in > that testDomainSetMemory() should now forward to > testDomainSetMemoryFlags(, VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE); and it would also be > worth implementing testDomainSetMaxMemory() to forward to > testDomainSetMemoryFlags(, VIR_DOMAIN_MEM_MAXIMUM).
Sure. But do you think they should be on the same patch? Maybe in a subsequent patch on the same series? > > Oh, and thinking about it, maybe everywhere we have > xxxDomainSetMaxMemory forwarding on, it seems odd that it is affecting > VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_CURRENT instead of VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE; but then we > have to start worrying about back-compat issues. :( According to the documentation this is hypervisor-dependent so in the case of the test driver I think it's fine to call it with VIR_DOMAIN_AFFECT_LIVE. However, changing it on other drivers raises compatibility issues as you mentioned. Ilias > > -- > Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer > Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 > Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org > -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
