On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 16:22:34 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 9/27/19 3:05 PM, Peter Krempa wrote:
> > Use VIR_AUTORELEASE instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkre...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 8 +++-----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> > index 0988071708..ed59e64c10 100644
> > --- a/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> > +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_driver.c
> > @@ -18911,21 +18911,19 @@ static int
> > qemuDomainBlockPull(virDomainPtr dom, const char *path, unsigned long
> > bandwidth,
> > unsigned int flags)
> > {
> > - virDomainObjPtr vm;
> > + VIR_AUTORELEASE(virDomainObjPtr) vm = NULL;
> > +
> > virCheckFlags(VIR_DOMAIN_BLOCK_PULL_BANDWIDTH_BYTES, -1);
> >
> > if (!(vm = qemuDomObjFromDomain(dom)))
> > return -1;
> >
> > - if (virDomainBlockPullEnsureACL(dom->conn, vm->def) < 0) {
> > - virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
> > + if (virDomainBlockPullEnsureACL(dom->conn, vm->def) < 0)
> > return -1;
> > - }
> >
> > if (virDomainListCheckpoints(vm->checkpoints, NULL, dom, NULL, 0) >
> > 0) {
> > virReportError(VIR_ERR_OPERATION_UNSUPPORTED, "%s",
> > _("cannot perform block pull while checkpoint
> > exists"));
> > - virDomainObjEndAPI(&vm);
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
>
> This needs to be rebased. But also, you've missed one virDomainObjEndAPI() at
> the end. This patch needs to look like this:
Yes as I've pushed the other patches now. Also I'm not really sure I
want to go ahead with any other VIR_AUTO things since we'll be
converting them to glib afterwards.
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
