On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 01:50:50PM +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > Currently we had hard-coded `zanata` as a name of the binary, but > it can also be `zanata-cli`.
FWIW, I hardcoded 'zanata' for two reasons - It is a light weight python client, compared to the java client which pulls in a huge dep chains. - I found the java client unreliable eg several times when pushing a new .pot file, it pushed the pot but failed to tell the server to preserve existing translations, so we lost all translations. I'd hope the latter is fixed now, but honestly I would still not recommend using the java client, when the python client is working nicely. Is there a particular reason you wanted to make it autodetect ? Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
