On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:24:44AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 10:09:34 +0000
> Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 02:23:38PM -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote:
> > > mdevctl also supports assigning arbitrary sysfs attributes to a device.
> > > These attributes have an explicit ordering and are written to sysfs in
> > > the specified order when a device is started. This might be the only
> > > thing that doesn't fit into the current xml format.  
> 
> Not sure how much the 'explicit ordering' is actually required by the
> devices currently supporting this. It's probably a good idea to keep
> this, though, as future device types might end up having such a
> requirement.
> 
> > Well we need to define a schema, but there will need to be some kind
> > of validation added because. AFAICT, mdevctl does no validation, so a
> > plain passthrough of this allows arbitrary writing of files anywhere
> > on the host given a suitable malicious attribute name.
> 
> Uh, we really should do something about that in mdevctl as well. Writes
> outside the sysfs hierarchy should not be allowed.

I'm pretty worried about overall safety/reliability of the mdevctrl
tool in general. Given that it is written in shell, it is really hard
to ensure that it isn't vulnerable to any shell quoting / meta character
flaws, whether from malicious or accidental data input.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to