On 01/26/2010 10:04 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
Yep, generally speaking if a caller needs to be given back the actual errno value, then the function should be returing '-errno' instead of the fixed -1.
-errno? Interesting. I recently fixed calls to virFileMakePath which were looking for return < 0 to look for return != 0, because it returns the value of errno (not -errno) in case of an error. Should I have changed virFileMakePath to return -errno instead? All of the negations through different paths in multiple layers might start to get confusing...
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
