The current code uses virCgroupNew() as a single point of entry and
calls into virCgroupDetect() as well. Both have logic for several paths
which is difficult to figure out.

Extract the actually used code path from the two functions to make
it obvious what's happening in this case.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrd...@redhat.com>
---
 src/util/vircgroup.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/util/vircgroup.c b/src/util/vircgroup.c
index 97e15c0ab3..b11139bef1 100644
--- a/src/util/vircgroup.c
+++ b/src/util/vircgroup.c
@@ -861,6 +861,40 @@ virCgroupSetPartitionSuffix(const char *path, char **res)
 }
 
 
+static int
+virCgroupNewFromParent(virCgroupPtr parent,
+                       const char *path,
+                       int controllers,
+                       virCgroupPtr *group)
+{
+    g_autoptr(virCgroup) new = g_new0(virCgroup, 1);
+
+    VIR_DEBUG("parent=%p path=%s controllers=%d group=%p",
+              parent, path, controllers, group);
+
+    if (virCgroupSetBackends(new) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (virCgroupCopyMounts(new, parent) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (virCgroupCopyPlacement(new, path, parent) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (virCgroupDetectPlacement(new, -1, path) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (virCgroupValidatePlacement(new, -1) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    if (virCgroupDetectControllers(new, controllers, parent) < 0)
+        return -1;
+
+    *group = g_steal_pointer(&new);
+    return 0;
+}
+
+
 /**
  * virCgroupNewPartition:
  * @path: path for the partition
@@ -910,7 +944,7 @@ virCgroupNewPartition(const char *path,
             return -1;
     }
 
-    if (virCgroupNew(-1, newPath, parent, controllers, &newGroup) < 0)
+    if (virCgroupNewFromParent(parent, newPath, controllers, &newGroup) < 0)
         return -1;
 
     if (parent) {
@@ -965,7 +999,7 @@ virCgroupNewDomainPartition(virCgroupPtr partition,
     if (virCgroupPartitionEscape(&grpname) < 0)
         return -1;
 
-    if (virCgroupNew(-1, grpname, partition, -1, &newGroup) < 0)
+    if (virCgroupNewFromParent(partition, grpname, -1, &newGroup) < 0)
         return -1;
 
     /*
@@ -1032,7 +1066,7 @@ virCgroupNewThread(virCgroupPtr domain,
                    (1 << VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPUACCT) |
                    (1 << VIR_CGROUP_CONTROLLER_CPUSET));
 
-    if (virCgroupNew(-1, name, domain, controllers, &newGroup) < 0)
+    if (virCgroupNewFromParent(domain, name, controllers, &newGroup) < 0)
         return -1;
 
     if (virCgroupMakeGroup(domain, newGroup, create, VIR_CGROUP_THREAD) < 0)
@@ -1133,11 +1167,10 @@ virCgroupEnableMissingControllers(char *path,
         if (t)
             *t = '\0';
 
-        if (virCgroupNew(pidleader,
-                         path,
-                         parent,
-                         controllers,
-                         &tmp) < 0)
+        if (virCgroupNewFromParent(parent,
+                                   path,
+                                   controllers,
+                                   &tmp) < 0)
             return -1;
 
         if (virCgroupMakeGroup(parent, tmp, true, VIR_CGROUP_SYSTEMD) < 0)
@@ -2583,7 +2616,7 @@ virCgroupKillRecursiveInternal(virCgroupPtr group,
 
         VIR_DEBUG("Process subdir %s", ent->d_name);
 
-        if (virCgroupNew(-1, ent->d_name, group, -1, &subgroup) < 0)
+        if (virCgroupNewFromParent(group, ent->d_name, -1, &subgroup) < 0)
             return -1;
 
         if ((rc = virCgroupKillRecursiveInternal(subgroup, signum, pids,
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to