Am Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:40:02 +0100 schrieb Olaf Hering <[email protected]>:
> AC_PATH_PROG([PARTED], [parted], [], [$LIBVIRT_SBIN_PATH]) Is there a consensus now how to address this? >From what I understand, using just exec(BASENAME) to search for the binary in >PATH is acceptable. It may result in surprises on systems which have BASENAME >in /usr/local/*bin. Previously the absolute path at build time was used. I >think this can be tolerated. Should there be a list of each called binary in meson.build? This would at least give some hint about what might be called at runtime, even if the result of find_program() will not be stored in the resulting libvirt binaries. Olaf
pgpsMIk9nfwr5.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
