On 12/03/21 09:14, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:
On 11/03/21 15:08, Markus Armbruster wrote:
I would rather keep the OptsVisitor here. Do the same check for JSON
syntax that you have in qobject_input_visitor_new_str, and whenever
you need to walk all -object arguments, use something like this:
typedef struct ObjectArgument {
const char *id;
QDict *json; /* or NULL for QemuOpts */
QSIMPLEQ_ENTRY(ObjectArgument) next;
}
I already had patches in my queue to store -object in a GSList of
dictionaries, changing it to use the above is easy enough.
I think I'd prefer following -display's precedence. See my reply to
Kevin for details.
Yeah, I got independently to the same conclusion and posted patches
for that. I was scared that visit_type_ObjectOptions was too much for
OptsVisitor but it seems to work...
We have reason to be scared. I'll try to cover this in my review.
Yes, it's a good reason to possibly even delay those 3 patches to 6.1.
Paolo
