On 3/12/21 8:59 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 3/11/21 7:47 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 06:54:20PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
Historically, we declared pointer type to our types:
typedef struct _virXXX virXXX;
typedef virXXX *virXXXPtr;
Also dropping usage of the "Ptr" should be separate from dropping
the typedefs themselves as I think that'll make conflicts easier
to deal with.
Yeah, this makes sense. I'll split it.
On a second thought, does it make sense? I don't think that somebody
would want to backport just the rewrite without dropping the typedefs,
or backport just the typedef drop without the rewrite. It's all or nothing.
Michal
