On 7/29/21 1:51 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>> On 7/29/21 4:16 AM, Yi Wang wrote:
>>> From: Jia Zhou <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> When loop in function virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList() there may be
>>> reused index @i, this patch fix this by using a new @j.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jia Zhou <[email protected]>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> src/util/virnvme.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/util/virnvme.c b/src/util/virnvme.c
>>> index 49102e3..b54a195 100644
>>> --- a/src/util/virnvme.c
>>> +++ b/src/util/virnvme.c
>>> @@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
>>> virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList,
>>> virNVMeDeviceListPtr toReAttachList)
>>> {
>>> g_autoptr(virPCIDeviceList) pciDevices = NULL;
>>> - size_t i;
>>> + size_t i, j;
This new variable can be declared inside the loop since it's needed only
there.
>>>
>>> if (!(pciDevices = virPCIDeviceListNew()))
>>> return NULL;
>>> @@ -412,8 +412,8 @@
>>> virNVMeDeviceListCreateReAttachList(virNVMeDeviceListPtr activeList,
>>> /* Check if there is any other NVMe device with the same PCI
>>> address as
>>> * @d. To simplify this, let's just count how many NVMe devices
>>> with
>>> * the same PCI address there are on the @activeList. */
>>> - for (i = 0; i < activeList->count; i++) {
>>> - virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[i];
>>> + for (j = 0; j < activeList->count; j++) {
>>> + virNVMeDevicePtr other = activeList->devs[j];
This doesn't look rebased on the top of anything recent. In commit
v7.3.0-rc1~229 I've dropped internal virXXXPtr and replaced them with
virXXX *.
>>>
>>> if (!virPCIDeviceAddressEqual(&d->address, &other->address))
>>> continue;
>>>
>>
>> Ooops yes. This is a bug. However, I'd prefer that 'j' would be defined
>> inside the loop.
>>
>> Also, I'm having difficulties applying this patch. Partly because it's
>> multipart e-mail and even if I extract text/plain part then git am is
>> still unhappy. Can you please use git send-email?
>
> Actually I used git send-email to send this patch, and I have forwarded this
> to our IT department, but unfortunately that may take a long long time :(
Yeah, it would be great if this could get resolved.
>
> Would you please apply this patch manually first? Many thanks.
I've done that. Fortunately, the change was simple enough and it fixes a
bug in the code I've written.
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <[email protected]>
Michal
