On 9/12/23 03:58, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 17:07:07 -0400, Collin Walling wrote: >> Notes: >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-09/msg02518.html >> - For information regarding the QEMU "static-recommended" (aka >> host-recommended) >> CPU model, please see the analogous QEMU patches: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-09/msg02518.html >> >> - Patches include caps added to QEMU 8.1 test files. This is a stand-in for >> the >> interim and the appropriate caps files will be updated in the future >> pending >> QEMU acceptance. > > I went looking for the feature in qemu and couldn't find it, but you > explain it here. > > Note that it's acceptable only as a RFC to gather feedback, but must not > be comitted in this form. The capability dumps must represent real qemu > capabilities, and thus hacks where you "backport" something are not > acceptable. > > Once the qemu patches get commited upstream, it's okay if you create a > capability dump from the in-progress development cycle. We do that also > for x86_64. >
Absolutely makes sense. I agree, should have posted as an RFC. Will keep this noted for the future. -- Regards, Collin
