----- "Perry Myers" <[email protected]> wrote: > From: "Perry Myers" <[email protected]> > To: "David Teigland" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 12:13:16 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [libvirt] using sync_manager with libvirt > > On 08/19/2010 01:23 PM, David Teigland wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:12:25AM -0400, David Teigland wrote: > >> I'm only aware of one goal, and the current plan is to implement it > >> correctly and completely. That goal is to lock vm images so if the vm > >> happens to run on two hosts, only one instance can access the image. > > Ok. So for the first implementation of sync_manager it will still be > possible for someone to corrupt data by configuring two separate vms to > accidentally use the same storage volumes. That's fine for the first > pass, just something to keep in mind for later.
Presumably it'll use support the <shareable/> flag for shared disks. > > > (That's slightly misleading; technically, the lock prevents a second qemu > > process from even being started.) > > ack > > Perry > > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list >
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
