2011/1/4 Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]>:
> NB, there was a discussion with the dnsmsaq maintainer a few
> months back now about changing the dnsmasq architecture such
> that we only need one dnsmasq process.

is this consistent with Laine's arguments about radvd?
read last paragraph of this:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2010-December/msg00912.html

-- 
Pawel

--
libvir-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list

Reply via email to