On 02/10/2011 08:01 AM, Zdenek Styblik wrote: [...]
Actually, I think these would be _("[<%s>]") (note the<> to signify the meta-syntactic term). But I like the idea; this shortens the synopsis form, while still leaving the usage form to explain the meta-syntactic term.Right, because '--%s' is mandatory. Should I re-post the patch, or...? Thanks, Z.
Should be fine. Z. -- Zdenek Styblik Net/Linux admin OS TurnovFree.net email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected]
>From e3963c04b3e95eee570f4e870c7c44cf211148ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zdenek Styblik <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 12:25:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Unify virsh help synopsis output Signed-off-by: Zdenek Styblik <[email protected]> --- tools/virsh.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/virsh.c b/tools/virsh.c index 6d9861f..9063365 100644 --- a/tools/virsh.c +++ b/tools/virsh.c @@ -10637,11 +10637,11 @@ vshCmddefHelp(vshControl *ctl, const char *cmdname) case VSH_OT_INT: /* xgettext:c-format */ fmt = ((opt->flag & VSH_OFLAG_REQ) ? "<%s>" - : _("[--%s <number>]")); + : _("[<%s>]")); break; case VSH_OT_STRING: /* xgettext:c-format */ - fmt = _("[--%s <string>]"); + fmt = _("[<%s>]"); break; case VSH_OT_DATA: fmt = ((opt->flag & VSH_OFLAG_REQ) ? "<%s>" : "[<%s>]"); -- 1.7.3.4
-- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
