On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 14:35:23 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > valgrind warns: > > ==21079== Syscall param rt_sigaction(act->sa_mask) points to uninitialised > byte(s) > ==21079== at 0x329840F63E: __libc_sigaction (sigaction.c:67) > ==21079== by 0x4E5A8E7: __virExec (util.c:661) > > Regression introduced in commit ab07533e. Technically, sa_mask > shouldn't affect operation if sa_flags selects sa_handler, and > sa_handler selects SIG_IGN, but better safe than sorry.
Yeah, I agree. ACK. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
